Pinned entities
Anchor wallet clusters, counterparties, and transaction evidence around the live case thesis.
Case management
Forensic workspace
case matrix.
Organize high-stakes blockchain forensics in a structured evidence environment
Analysts often conduct complex blockchain investigations using disparate tools, spreadsheets, and whiteboard sketches. This leads to fragmented evidence and lost institutional knowledge.
Case environment
Keep graph, narrative, evidence, and authorship inside one reviewable workspace.
Chain of custody visible
Narrative overlay
Preserve investigator reasoning with notes, timestamps, and context tied to the graph itself.
Export readiness
Move from working case to structured dossier without rebuilding the story from scratch.
01
Case Initiation
Establishing the core thesis and initial entity-set for a new forensic investigation.
02
Evidence Ingestion
Pinning wallets, transaction hashes, and OSINT metadata into a unified graph.
03
Narrative Overlay
Building the timeline and investigator notes for a coherent, evidence-based story.
04
Dossier Export
Compiling the final workspace into a structured, court-ready investigation report.
Why workspace discipline matters
The investigation gets weaker every time the evidence leaves the case environment.
This page is built for teams that need structured evidence handling, collaborative analysis, and repeatable dossier production under real investigative pressure.
01
Evidence fragments when the case lives in five tools.
Wallets, screenshots, notes, and timelines stop being one investigation when they are spread across chat threads, spreadsheets, and whiteboards.
02
Chain of custody becomes a storytelling problem.
Analysts need timestamps, authorship, and pinned context so evidence survives review without relying on memory.
03
Institutional knowledge disappears after the case closes.
A reusable forensic practice depends on preserving the graph, the notes, and the reasoning path in one place.
How it works
Hold the investigation together as one graph-native record.
Our workspace provides a unified, graph-centric case environment where analysts can pin entities, save time-stamped evidence, and maintain a narrative audit trail for any investigation.
01
Graph Centric Case Logic
Unified workspace that maintains relational integrity between evidence, notes, and entities.
02
Audit Trail Integrity
Cryptographically hashed timestamps for every piece of evidence to ensure legal admissibility.
03
Collaborative Consensus
Multi-analyst tagging system for cross-verifying investigative assumptions.
What the team can do
Save cases
Attach wallets/entities
Annotate notes
Tag evidence
Track timelines
Export reports
Team collaboration
What proves case integrity
01
Collaborative tag consistency
02
Evidence-chain integrity timestamps
03
Internal analyst attribution
04
Entity-note relational tagging
05
Exportable forensic audit-log
What leaves the workspace
Unified case file
Collaborative graphs
Exportable audit trails
Typical stakeholders
Intelligence TeamsLaw EnforcementPrivate Investigators
Systematize institutional knowledge and ensure every investigation is built on a foundation of verifiable, collaborative evidence.
Next step
Run the case in a system built for evidence, not improvised memory.
Use this workflow when an investigation program needs repeatable structure, collaborative reasoning, and exportable case records.
Team review
Use this route when the team wants to review workspace logic, evidence handling, and collaboration controls.
Book workspace reviewActive case setup
Use this route when an active matter needs a structured case environment for evidence, notes, and export.
Open case workspace