Source of funds
Inspect origin history before treasury or payment teams inherit unknown exposure.
Counterparty review
Counterparty exposure
autonomy.
Assess entity risk-surface before exposure becomes operational loss
Digital asset firms often transact with wallets they do not fully understand. Hidden exposure, suspicious routing, or behavioral anomalies can introduce avoidable risk.
Decision memo
Clear, escalate, or block before exposure compounds.
Pre-engagement
Adjacency review
Detect indirect exposure to high-risk services, sanctioned clusters, and suspicious intermediaries.
Behavior profile
Separate normal institutional or commercial behavior from routing patterns that warrant escalation.
Decision output
Produce a memo and score summary that teams can route into approval, rejection, or manual review.
Questions before capital moves
The right question is not “is this wallet active,” but “should we trust it with capital?”
This page is built for operators who need a defensible approval decision before a relationship, transfer, or settlement becomes an operational liability.
01
Who is really acting behind the wallet?
The problem is not whether an address exists. The problem is whether the economic actor behind it is coherent, attributable, and consistent.
02
What risk is hiding in the route history?
Source-of-funds, sanctions adjacency, and suspicious service interaction often emerge from prior movement, not from the current wallet snapshot alone.
03
Can the decision survive internal review?
Treasury, compliance, and trading teams need a decision memo that explains why the counterparty is safe, unsafe, or needs escalation.
01
BEHAVIORAL_SCORING
Neural-network based scoring that identifies non-human or automated trading patterns indicative of risk.
02
ORIGIN_RESOLVER
Recursive source-of-funds logic that identifies the ultimate origin of assets across multiple hops.
03
ASSOCIATION_LOGIC
Proprietary graph analysis that identifies proximity to illicit entities even when direct touchpoints are missing.
What gets reviewed
Wallet and entity screening
Source-of-funds visibility
Sanctions adjacency review
Service interaction history
Anomaly and behavior pattern analysis
Pre-engagement risk summary
What triggers escalation
01
Interaction with high-risk CEX/VASPs
02
Source-of-funds from high-risk pools
03
Unusually high gas-burning behavior
04
Association with flagged OSINT metadata
05
Frequent interaction with mixing protocols
How the review moves
A screening workflow that ends in a usable decision.
01
Address Ingestion
Syncing the target wallet or VPC for immediate historical interaction scanning.
02
Deep interaction Analysis
Parsing every transaction for service-provider signatures and counterparty risk tags.
03
Entity Attribution
Mapping anonymous addresses to known institutions, services, and high-risk clusters.
04
Risk Memo Generation
Compiling an explainable, audit-ready scorecard of counterparty reliability.
Workflow proof
A screening review is only useful if the decision can be audited later.
The workflow needs to show what was reviewed, what triggered escalation, and why the final recommendation was clear, conditional, or blocked. That is what makes the memo usable for treasury, compliance, and trading teams after the initial analyst pass.
01
Review traceability
The memo ties the decision back to concrete source-of-funds history, counterparty exposure, and behavior signals instead of an unexplained score.
02
Escalation logic
Teams can see why a relationship cleared, why it requires more diligence, or why the review should stop before capital moves.
03
Reusable decision output
The same work product can move into approval queues, treasury sign-off, or broader investigation scope without restarting the analysis from zero.
Why teams use it
Protect operations before exposure becomes a downstream crisis.
Protect treasury and operational stability by identifying hidden exposure before it surfaces in regulatory audits or operational loss.
Counterparty memoRisk score summaryExposure breakdownEntity interaction history
Team review
Use this route when the team is comparing screening logic, outputs, and approval workflows.
Book screening reviewActive assessment
Use this route when a counterparty must be assessed before settlement, onboarding, or treasury action.
Open assessment intakeReview template
If the team needs a repeatable structure before opening a larger diligence engagement, use the source-of-funds review template to frame the approval logic.
Use source-of-funds template