Secure intake

Secure intake for live blockchain matters.

Use this channel when the next move is a real conversation, not a generic sales handoff. Incident response, deployment review, and recurring intelligence support all route through the same monitored intake layer.

Start with the mission type that matches the pressure you are under. The intake will route the request into the right service lane without asking you to translate the problem into vendor language.

Open intake Review service lanes

Before you open intake

Choose the mission type

Pick the route that best matches the live decision so the request lands in the right monitored queue.

Prepare the core evidence

Have wallet addresses, transaction identifiers, screenshots, venue references, or deployment context ready to attach.

Set the clock

Call out whether the matter is active now, tied to a filing or briefing deadline, or part of a longer review cycle.

Routing overview

Select the route based on urgency and decision context.

Monitored intake

Active incident

Incident response & asset tracing

Use this when the matter is already live: theft, fraud, suspicious transfers, exploit response, or a recovery-sensitive investigation.

Wallet screening

Screening & counterparty diligence

Use this when the work is a source-of-funds review, wallet screening decision, counterparty approval, or pre-transaction diligence.

Monitoring & exposure

Monitoring, sanctions, or exposure intelligence

Use this when the work is recurring oversight: watchlists, sanctions adjacency, exposure updates, or behavior-change monitoring.

Reporting support

Expert reports & case support

Use this when technical findings need to become a reviewable brief, chronology pack, executive summary, or insurer-facing report.

Platform deployment

Platform & API deployment

Use this when the question is platform fit, workflow architecture, API deployment, or procurement-led technical review.

Before you submit

Submit only enough signal to start the right conversation.

The intake endpoint is monitored and routed internally, but this first message should still avoid full evidence packages, private keys, or unredacted wallet clusters.

Initial scope only

Describe the problem, urgency, and desired outcome. Do not submit full evidentiary packages or sensitive wallet inventories in this first message.

Operational framing

If the issue is active, say so plainly. Incident response routing is different from a general deployment or service-scope discussion.

Decision context

Mention whether the audience is legal, compliance, treasury, or executive. That changes how the response should be shaped.

PGP fingerprint: 4A7E 99B2 0F18 221C
Encryption: AES-256-GCM

Prefill detected

Monitoring, sanctions, or exposure intelligence

The intake arrived from another route with a preselected mission type so you can continue without rewriting the request context.

Request intake

Dispatch the request into ChainÆther.

Choose the route, summarize the need, and the intake layer will hand it into the right operational path.

What happens next

The first response is routing and scoping, not an automated nurture sequence.

Once the request lands, the goal is to identify consequence, urgency, and the right operating lane. That keeps demo traffic, live matters, and analyst-service requests from collapsing into the same queue behavior.

Triage the request

The intake is reviewed for urgency, mission type, and whether the problem is product evaluation, live investigation, or analyst-service scope.

Clarify the operating lane

If the request is viable, the next exchange sharpens the scope, decision context, and whether the handoff belongs to incident response, screening, monitoring, reporting, or deployment review.

Route into the working team

Once the lane is clear, the conversation moves into the relevant operational or commercial path instead of staying in a generic front-door queue.